Audio/video stream recording forums
|
Attention Visitor: |
You may have to register or log in before you can post:
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Screencapture Codec any advantage to normal CodecHello,
can anyone tell me in which occasions it is recommended to take a special screen grabber/capture codec instead of a normal Codec like divx or x264? Also can anyone tell me how a screencapture works or whats the difference between the other video codecs? Is it right that the screencapture codecs are lossless? Regards, islondo |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Screencapture Codec any advantage to normal Codec?????
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Screencapture Codec any advantage to normal CodecHi
When I've done screen capture I used x264 -preset ultrafast -crf 0. This is 'lossless' settings for x264. And I use PCM or FLAC for the audio track. Creates very big files. The reason is so that the PC can capture in 'real-time'. My PC would not be able to keep up if it was trying to capture and compress at the same time. When the capture is finished, then I convert from lossless to compressed, in my own time. Other people may use different methods, though. |
Tags: codec, screen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|