Screencapture Codec any advantage to normal CodecHello,
can anyone tell me in which occasions it is recommended to take a special screen grabber/capture codec instead of a normal Codec like divx or x264? Also can anyone tell me how a screencapture works or whats the difference between the other video codecs? Is it right that the screencapture codecs are lossless? Regards, islondo |
Re: Screencapture Codec any advantage to normal Codec?????
|
Re: Screencapture Codec any advantage to normal CodecQuote:
When I've done screen capture I used x264 -preset ultrafast -crf 0. This is 'lossless' settings for x264. And I use PCM or FLAC for the audio track. Creates very big files. The reason is so that the PC can capture in 'real-time'. :) My PC would not be able to keep up if it was trying to capture and compress at the same time. :eek: When the capture is finished, then I convert from lossless to compressed, in my own time. :cool: Other people may use different methods, though. :p |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:41 AM. |