Audio/video stream recording forums
|
Attention Visitor: |
You may have to register or log in before you can post:
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stream downloaders, rippers vs. Screen capture softwareThere are two ways in which you can capture streaming video from the web to your PC.
One are the stream downloaders, softwares that offer you the option to download the video you are watching on your browser directly to your hard drive. The second are the video capture applications which allow you to select the part of the screen you want to record and grab the video from there. Tha main advantage of the video capture applications is that they can record DRM protected content. Best, Alex |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stream downloaders, rippers vs. Screen capture softwareFew video streams are DRM protected. Plus stream downloaders give you better quality.
You might prefer to use screen video capture software for recording live streams if you frequently experience stream buffering and your stream downloader stops downloading because of that. Also screen capture software is the only way to record non-downloadable video streams. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stream downloaders, rippers vs. Screen capture softwareI'm at odds on what to do about constant live stream dropouts and reading this thread makes me consider screen video capture software for recording my mms live broadcasting.
I've been tweaking around with various download managers and most will do the basic job of downloading instantly, however...
Sorry for not specifying versions for these apps, I downloaded them on April or May/2009. I guess the recording dropouts/internet connection/streaming/bufforing are beyond any downloader capability so I'm wondering if screen video capture is the way to go. What is the quality of a screen captured video compared to stream media recording? Any of these screen capture softwares have a good scheduler? I'm guessing there are no interruption issues? help |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: Stream downloaders, rippers vs. Screen capture softwareWM Recorder is the most powerful Windows Media stream recorder. It has a scheduler. I suggest you to try it before using any screen video capture software.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The major problem of screen capture software is that your computer need to be powerful enough to avoid frame drops, plus you need to choose a video resolution and audio/video codecs properly. Quote:
If your player won't stop playing, then there should be no problem recording. Not every player can reconnect infinite number of times, while some streaming video rippers can do that. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stream downloaders, rippers vs. Screen capture softwareThx for your help and this resourceful web site, I learned a bit about screen capture and don't think it's for me. For one, it cannot work in the background, is that right? Aside that, it hogs CPU and must generate a big file - I wonder what size a 30 min 384X288 wmv video would be.
I need to learn more about live stream recording and find a way around the dropouts and disconnections. Net Transport 2.84 resumes download but the interruptions result in chopped up videos. Is there a ripper that won't interrupt recording whilst streaming is interrupted? I appreciate it |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stream downloaders, rippers vs. Screen capture softwareQuote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stream downloaders, rippers vs. Screen capture softwareRecording from screen while working with other applications
Quote:
Quote:
Imagine a live video broadcast. If you can't watch it, there is no recorder that can possibly restore full video. Otherwise the broadcast won't be live. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stream downloades, rippers vs. Screen capture softwareQuote:
Quote:
Unfortunately I did not save the log file that day. I just wish NT would produce only one file, that way, I could be certain it was a streaming problem and not the downloader, if it makes any sense. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stream downloades, rippers vs. Screen capture softwareQuote:
The first question I asked to the developer of WM Capture after learning about this new feature was about other top windows. He said that this wouldn't be a problem, he had tested such cases. Quote:
But it seems that the developer decided to split files to show you explicitely that there were some problems with live streams. Otherwise you might need to fix the recorded file, but besides WM Recorder few programs have this feature. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stream downloaders, rippers vs. Screen capture softwareIt's been frustrating the missed schedulings and constant dropouts. Last night I set three downloaders to record the same program and all three failed! NetTransport (NT) (freeware version) and NT 2.84 missed it entirely and Wellget dropped, recording only 4 min out of the 30 min program.
Macromaker has worked flawlessly with the multiple scheduling but getting Wellget downloader to start on schedule just to have it drop doesn't help. I might have to revert to Orbit Downloader and index the recorded file with another app, dunno why this isn't included but as long as it's free, I'm a happy customer Wish NT had a forum as resourceful as this one |
Tags: capture, downloader, ripper, screen, screen capture, stream, stream downloader, stream ripper, streaming |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|