Determining maximum resolution on Chaturbate?

[zargod]

Is there any way of finding out a feed's maximum resolution on Chaturbate without manually opening up the page to inspect it? Or better yet, filter-by-resolution.

The 'HD' tag (on the navigation pages) seems to be largely useless (its lack might weed out those with very low resolution, but that's all).

And given the shear number of streams it would be good to be able to concentrate on the smaller number of high resolution feeds, given how terrible low-res feeds look fullscreen on a large, modern monitor.

Those with max res of 720 & above show up as a 'HD' on the feed's resolution-choice 'cog' icon -- but that still means opening up each feed's page manually.

[j_cool]

C:\>streamlink.exe "https://chaturbate.com/livecleo/"
[cli][info] Found matching plugin chaturbate for URL https://chaturbate.com/livecleo/
Available streams: 240p (worst), 360p, 480p, 576p, 720p, 1080p (best)


C:\>youtube-dl.exe -v -F --no-check-certificate https://chaturbate.com/livecleo/
[debug] System config: []
[debug] User config: []
[debug] Custom config: []
[debug] Command-line args: ['-v', '-F', '--no-check-certificate', 'https://chaturbate.com/livecleo/']
[debug] Encodings: locale cp1252, fs mbcs, out cp850, pref cp1252
[debug] youtube-dl version 2017.08.23
[debug] Python version 3.4.4 - Windows-7-6.1.7601-SP1
[debug] exe versions: ffmpeg 3.3.3, ffprobe 3.3.3, rtmpdump 2.4
[debug] Proxy map: {}
[Chaturbate] livecleo: Downloading webpage
[Chaturbate] livecleo: Downloading m3u8 information
[info] Available formats for livecleo:
format code extension resolution note
slow-0 mp4 426x240 488k , avc1.66.21, mp4a.40.2
slow-1 mp4 640x360 928k , avc1.66.30, mp4a.40.2
slow-2 mp4 854x480 1258k , avc1.77.31, mp4a.40.2
slow-3 mp4 1024x576 2076k , avc1.77.31, mp4a.40.2
slow-4 mp4 1280x720 3396k , avc1.77.31, mp4a.40.2
slow-5 mp4 1920x1080 5628k , avc1.100.40, mp4a.40.2 (best)

[zargod]

Hmmm.

Running a command line for each feed probably isn't any quicker than opening each feed's page manually.

However if (for example) it could be set up as a batch job to take a text-file list of URLs and output resolution on each, it could be useful.

Certainly food for thought. Thanks.

Update: found somebody to give me a hand with the batch script. Seems to be working perfectly.